People have decided to hate me over a bunch of opinions. Here's the result.

Date: Thu, October 9, 2008 7:38 pm
From: "Name Removed due to confusion" <hate.the.creator@hotmail.com>
To: chris@christhecreator.com
Subject:

Dear Chris,
There are many words that come to mind after reading your site, naming them all
would waste not only your time, but mine as well. So, with that in mind I am going
to make this as brief as I can                 while still finding a way to point out that you,
are in every sense of the word, an idiot.
I will be ranting, of course, about several of your rants and I'll start off near
the beginning right around your "I am punk" rant.
        On this particular day, you clearly had a major case of something called an
"inferiority complex" (in case that word confused you, please refer to closest
dictionary) I say this because you essentially came up with every moronic way to
put down other people and their clothing and/or lifestyle choices. I'll start with
the first thing about this that pissed me off; This is your typical emo. This
pissed me off, yes. but also made me laugh because, shorten the hair, take away the
eyeliner and add a NOFX shirt and this is you (listening to NOFX does not make you
punk.) You also make a point of making fun of Goths and people who suffer from
depression (takes a big man to make fun of those who hate their lives already.)
Then your picture of the punk just depressed me, because you look nothing like him.
Now, I know you're reading this thinking "you can't base somebody's personality on
looks." Ladies and gentlemen, i give you a hypocrite.
        Now, there are more rants that make you look insecure and stupid (For insecurity,
refer to "No, you're just a sissy" and for Hypocrisy/stupidity, refer to "if you
hate life so much, end it" and "Suck it up, assholes")
        I however will jump up to "Teen Bi-sexuals are not Bi-sexuals" Besides the obvious,
the title clearly states that you know nothing about this topic. Now I could give
you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you know hundreds of bi-sexual teens
all over the world and have seen them face to face and know them all emotionally,
however I highly doubt that. At a point you even have the nerve to say that they
are bi-sexual to avoid making a hard discussion. You clearly have no idea how hard
of a decision it is to come out as bi. You spend all your time on the internet,
belittling others and "running your mouth" off about things you know very little
about.
        So with that I will be leaving, because it's dinner time and I'm starving. I hope
you take what I said into mind and get half a brain before hypocritically attack
the world around you. Yes I realize in no way was that brief but I guess I got
quite into it. Goodnight, Dumbass (capitalized because I'm nice enough to give it
to you as a title)

Sincerely, Your Friend,
Me

Dear Connor,

After reading your email, which probably took you more time than most of my rants take me, I have decided that you are, in many more ways that I am, an idiot. Before I even get to your rebuttle about my punk rant, I will point out that the rant 'A Note For The Slow' is a must read for any idiot who believed anything said in that rant. But I think it would still be fun to go over how many times you screwed up. You know, to show just how stupid you really are.

First, you claim that I have an inferiority complex and then go further to claim that the word would confuse me, because you no doubt take it to be a big word. However, I'm sorry my friend, but you are dealing with someone who has a genuine Narcissist Complex. Sometimes things are just what they look like, which is why it's a shame your mother didn't get rid of you when she saw you.

Next you claim that with a few adjustments, the typical emo is me. But, if you remove the eyeliner, shorten the hair and wear a NOFX t-shirt, you've got any other kid wearing black jeans and a NOFX t-shirt. Good job.

Then you claim that I make fun of goths and people who are depressed, and claim that they're easy targets because they already hate themselves. There are two issues with that. The first is that I didn't make fun of people who are depressed, I defended them. The second is that a goth is just another look, just like an emo. Also, you claim that I look nothing like the punk in the picture. To answer that, I direct you again to "A Note For The Slow".

And of course, it only seems fair to mention my "insecurity" in the rant "No, You're Just A Sissy". I assume that the insecurity you find here is because I'm unwilling to wear women's clothing and therefore I am "insecure about my masculinity". Well, you make the mistake there of not thinking of the obvious answer that it's because women's clothes are made for women, thus being called "women's clothes". In the same phrase, you point out the hypocrisy and contradictory natures of my rants "If You Hate Life So Much, End It" and "Suck It Up, Assholes". At first glance, the two are very contradictory. In one I'm promoting suicide, and in the other I'm against it. Except for one thing. Even though I don't promote suicide, I completely agree with emos killing themselves. It's kind of like a cleansing ritual. They kill themselves and in doing that they prove that they aren't emos and that they're actually depressed. Kind of harsh on them, but they were stupid enough to do it in the first place.

Next you decide to point out my lack of knowledge about bisexuals. Your point about it being hard to come out as a bisexual is a good one. It's very hard, and I wish you the best of luck. It would explain your taste for anal sex at least. But I won't go into detail there, because that would make this personal and not just me handing you your ass. Bisexuals do not have to choose whether they like men or women. Therefore, they are avoiding the decision. Can it be any clearer? Most of them don't end up coming halfway out of the closet because they've decided they can't take peoples opinions of them. So your point is pretty much that it's hard for people to decide whether they want to be themselves openly, or have people like their fake self. Good point, I really see the plight of the bisexual now.

As to how I "spend all [my] time on the internet, belittling others and "running [my] mouth" about things [I] know very little about", you missed a few key points. First, I spend most of my time alternating between work, school and sleeping, which doesn't leave much time for the internet, maybe about twenty minutes a day. Second, as you've stated, I belittle people in person aswell, not just online. And lastly, everything I use is fact, even if most people can't see it.

In closing, while I manage to give opinions which include fact, you use thoughts that you've pulled out of your ass (your boyfriend pulled out first) to attempt to insult someone who indeed out does your "half a brain".

Goodnight dumbass (I'm not nice enough to give it as a title)

Sincerely, your better,

Chris

Date: Sat, September 6, 2008 2:00 pm
From: gettalife@earthling.net
To: chris@christhecreator.com
Subject: You should do more research dumbass.

Scientology was created byL Ron Hubbard as a bet with another author Arthur C. Clarke for $1.00. L.Ron Hubbard bet he could create a religion if he wanted to and would be famous for it. The fact that they sent you a letter saying they are watching you... you are probably right there. Probably some dunbass kids like your self.

Apparently the dumbass who sent the last hatemail didn't hate my site enough to stop reading it. Also, apparently the dumbass who sent the last hatemail cannot see the issue with that defense of L. Ron Hubbard. Even if the religion was originally created to win a bet, Scientology was still started by a speculative fiction author and is still regarded as a religion, which means it is still a religion created by a fiction writer and therefore still a damned stupid thing to believe in. Also, I sincerely doubt that a man would start a religion for a dollar. If you really believe that, then your stupidity is on the same level as the scientologists.

Date: Sat, July 19, 2008 1:18 am
From: gettalife@earthling.net
To: chris@christhecreator.com
Subject: You Rape Dogs?

First of all your site is stupid. It is obvious that your site is full of rantings that are moronic in nature. In your latest post you state how using force on women is wrong then turn around and punch your grandmother. Hmmm way to go stupid.

This piece of hatemail, which I received after posting my article entitled 'Being random is not funny', is probably going to be more fun to respond to than the other two. Not because it's long or appears well thought out, that would go to the one below it. Not because I can mock the mailer's spelling or grammar, because I applaud them on having no errors in their english, placing them at at least a fifth grade level. No, this will be fun to respond to because of how easy it is to figure out that the mailer is a moron in a bad disguise. Here's the response I sent them:

Dear Dipshit,

First of all, your email is stupid. You start by pointing out that my site is stupid, something which I point out all the time, and then you expect it to be an insult. After that you state that 'It is obvious that [my] site is full of rantings that are moronic in nature'. Most people would have said something like 'Your site is obviously moronic.' or, 'Your site is full of moronic rants.' And I'm not talking about idiots either, I'm talking about normal people. The phrasing that you used would come out of the mouth of an idiot attempting to sound smart before it would come out of the mouth of a person with any level of real intelligence. To further your idiocy, you state that I called using force on women wrong. Actually, if you could read, you would have noticed that I said that forcing a woman to have sex with you is wrong. And as the cherry on the cake, you actually believed that I punched my grandmother. Hmmm, way to go dumbass.

Date: Fri, May 2, 2008 3:55 pm
From: flying_gummybears@hotmail.com
To: chris@christhecreator.com
Subject: the idea is that you read the email not this dumb little box
 
i was exceptionally bored which provoked me to read your...interesting....site. I
happened to have a fair amount of time on my hands (ps: that saying makes no sense
what so ever, unless i happened to be holding a watch or sundial or time-related
device on my hands) so i thought it might be interesting to rant a bit too.
Although, i hope to rant a little differently. For example, when I argue something i
might actually know a bit about it before i say something that isnt actually true
at all.

So, first of all: what good does ranting even do? I know it's a bit hypocritical to
rant about the stupidity of ranting but I'll prove my point because at the end I
will most likely have not effected your viewpoint on ranting at all. Now, you may
say, "Well, people actually do agree quite often with my rants!" This is true, but I
am ranting directly against your opinion whereas you rant on topics which most
poeple have either no opinion of, havent thought about before, or already agree
with. As an example, who wouldnt agree that "love" is an overused and meaningless
word? Most people dont really think about it at all and thus they use it
inappropriately.

To add to that, I bet most people who read and agreed with your arguments probably
didnt attempt at all to better the situation (examples: not say love like its
nothing or suddenly stop wearing eyeliner because their a boy). So now we see that
1: ranting only works if nobody really cares or everyone already agrees (which makes
it pointless because you arent convincing them of anything new) and 2: ranting
really doesnt make people change their actions, it only makes them more aware of
their stupidity for one small time in their life, and afterwards they forget.

On top of those two things, while the people most likely still do all such stupid
things and dont change their actions they probably have the nerve to judge others
from that point on when people do dumb things. So, 3: ranting gives people to right
to hypocracy.

now, i have to go because i have a life, which clearly you dont because you have
time to write all of these rantings which are clearly useless to society.

 
          Now, I applaud your somewhat humorous subject line, but beyond that the good points of your rant/hatemail are limited. I'll go through the points that were made, and if I can't respond to them, you win. If you win? Nothing happens, because as you've stated, you probably won't be able to sway me.
 
1. For example, when I argue something i might actually know a bit about it before i say something that isnt actually true at all.
This is a major flaw in your argument. You state that I don't know about what I rant about, and that I make untrue statements, yet you leave no reference as to where these flaws can be found. Ignoring that, while none of my rants are researched, I do know quite a bit about each topic, as they are the things in life that anger me/interest me.
2. you rant on topics which most poeple have either no opinion of, havent thought about  before, or already agree with.
My rants do not cater to most people. They are about what I hate, what I am interested in, or what I would abolish given the chance. Therefore, it doesn't matter if the people reading it lack an opinion, don't care, or agree with me, because either way, it states my opinion, which is what a rant is about.
3. I bet most people who read and agreed with your arguments probably didnt attempt at all to better the situation
Again, the rants are about my opinions, they are not an attempt to fix the world. The world is full of morons, and that will never change. There will always be men wearing makeup (faggots), there will always be misused words, and there will always be morons who think that they can change my opinion.
4. ranting only works if nobody really cares or everyone already agrees
Ranting does not serve a purpose to the general public, but to the ranter and any who enjoy reading the writings of an angry asshole. Agreeing has nothing to do with it, as I stated in my friend Holly's rant, which I disagree with but still find to be exceedingly awesome.
5. ranting really doesnt make people change their actions
Oh shit, I'm defeated. Oh wait, this is the same point as number 3. Dumbass.
6. while the people most likely still do all such stupid things and dont change their actions they probably have the nerve to judge others from that point on when people do dumb things. So, 3: ranting gives people to right to hypocracy.
People judge people anyway. That's not going to change. I judge fat chicks harsher than any other girls, no matter how good a personality they have, no matter how smart they are. They're still fat. At one point I was fat. I still made the same judgments. I had never read a rant site, yet I was still committing hypocrisy. Ranting does not give people the right to hypocrisy, the laws give people the right to hypocrisy.
7. now, i have to go because i have a life, which clearly you dont because you have
time to write all of these rantings which are clearly useless to society.
Damn, an insult at my lack of life. I guess you've beaten me. Except, you know, for the fact that you took the time to write me an email that's longer than most of my rants. I won't mention that you still managed to mess up the spelling, because that would be obvious to any of my (3) intelligent readers. There's also the fact that (before I continue, to all the readers, let me add that I know this girl. I won't give any details, you can find them yourselves if you want) I frequently have girlfriends ( something that say, a fat person couldn't do) , when I don't I mess around with other girls, I'm currently learning 4 instruments, and on top of that I have a job. This gives me very little time to be ranting, which would explain why my rants are so short.
 
In short, your entire theory has just been blown to pieces, probably due to the fact that they were written by somebody with absolutely no talent.
 
Good night, and have a pleasant tommorow.
 

From: Jacob Forrel (I originally left out the address to be nice, now I've lost it.)
To: Chris (ariseth@hotmail.com)
Subject: Die faggot!

Your such a faggot copying maddox you cant even come up with your own ideas you gotta copy maddox. I bet your jerking off while you read this i bet your jerking off to pictures of maddox cause not only are you a faggot copyer your gay! I hope you choke on something faggot! Choke on dick! I bet your gonna answer this so that you can copy maddox even more faggot! Die! Die! Die! Die! Die!

You're right. I am going to answer you. But not to copy Maddox. I'm going to answer you because I like to make fun of people and your email is just so easy to make fun of. Sorry, I ended a sentence with a proposition, wouldn't want you to send more hate mail involving that, so I'll fix it. I'm going to answer you because I like to make fun of people and your email is just so easy to make fun of, asshole.


You used the word faggot in there a lot, and called me gay multiple times. While I am very far from gay, your email begs the question: is there some problem with gays? I happen to have some gay friends. And I bet any of them could kick your ass. Hell, if I weren't the embodiment of perfection, they'd probably be able to kick my ass.

You use horrible grammar throughout the whole email, and you call me unoriginal. Yet you fit the mould of most of Maddox's hate mailers: a mispelling, english butchering moron.

And now, maybe you'll think before sending more hate mail, because you have just had your ass fed to you.

And besides, if I were a maddox wannabe, my picture would look like this. Asshole.